3
\$\begingroup\$

I am using this LDO in my design.The datasheet says the below thing about this LDO Enable pin.

enter image description here

My circuit is given below.

enter image description here

Analog devices AE team which reviewed the schematic says the below thing.

? It is not stated in the datasheet that the EN chip is internally protected, therefore I would recommend including a pull-up resistor.

Do I need to keep it? If yes, can I put 10K between Vin and EN

UPDATE:

BELOW is the response received from the concerned forum of ADI.I received the first response from ADC AE team because this regulator is powering my ADC.Now I received respose from the team which is taking care of this regulator.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
14
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Internally protected against what? What failure mode are they worried about here? \$\endgroup\$
    – Hearth
    Commented yesterday
  • \$\begingroup\$ The datasheet exactly mentions "connect EN to VIN", so you may do that. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ben Voigt
    Commented yesterday
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ A protection circuit might include a diode to VIN anyway so I can't see how connecting it directly - as it says in the datasheet - could cause any problems. \$\endgroup\$
    – Finbarr
    Commented yesterday
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @Justme I have known AE's to be wrong. I have known Application Notes to be wrong (eg clamping a mains driven high R resistor with IC body diodes (!)). I have known datasheets* to be wrong too - my omission and inclusion. BUT I'd place a datasheet as head of the queue - and if there is disagreement I'd politely ask for chapter and verse on why. \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented 13 hours ago
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @Justme *I've known (many) disreputable datasheets to be very wrong due to having been copied and adjusted from other sources, but that's a different arena. A while ago I used to look for unique looking phrases in datasheets and then web search for that phrase to find their source. Often enough a chain of sources was found. \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented 13 hours ago

3 Answers 3

6
\$\begingroup\$

The ADM7155 datasheet has this table on page 5:

enter image description here

The line "EN to GND" states that the EN pin will tolerate up to +7V with respect to ground. This makes sense, because that's also the maximum tolerable potential at VIN.

The EN pin doesn't need any more protection than VIN itself. If you tie EN directly to VIN, and you are sure that VIN is never going to exceed +7V, then no damage will occur. Whatever is "protecting" EN inside the IC, if anything, is sufficient already.

I have no idea what the "AE team" is talking about, the datasheet makes it abundantly clear that tying EN to VIN is perfectly fine.

The only hint I could find regarding protection is from this diagram on page 14:

enter image description here

All this does is reinforce my conviction that no damage will occur unless you apply more than +7V to EN, which would cause the zener diode to conduct heavily. However, that zener diode does imply that including a resistor would limit EN current in the event that you apply more than +7V. If you've tied EN directly to VIN, and then set VIN above +7V, then the entire IC is already damaged, and any damage to EN circuitry is moot.

I would suggest that this "resistor protection" might only be relevant if you are controlling the ADM7155 from a separate system, able to apply above +7V to EN. In that case a resistor would permit the internal protection zener diode to "clamp" to the +7V maximum, while the resistor limits the resulting current.

That's still not a great idea, it's best to ensure that the control system never apply more than necessary to "trigger" EN, which is determined by the hysteresis and thresholds described on page 24. I infer from that rather detailed description that it is intended for EN to permit under-voltage lockout, using a resistor divider to apply some fraction of \$V_{IN}\$ to EN; perhaps that's the motivation for a discussion about using resistors with EN.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I received response from concerned LDO team.The pull up resistor for LDO is not required.I have added that response in the question as an update. \$\endgroup\$
    – Confused
    Commented 18 hours ago
5
\$\begingroup\$

I look in the the datasheet that there is a 7V zener to GND. But no pull up resistor is needed or required as such. Maximum voltage is specified to 7V.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I received response from concerned LDO team.The pull up resistor for LDO is not required.I have added that response in the question as an update \$\endgroup\$
    – Confused
    Commented 18 hours ago
3
\$\begingroup\$

You have the data sheet that says one thing.

You have official statement from Analog Devices AE who recommend you what you should do.

There is no way for anyone else to know without internal knowledge of the chip what you should do.

Choise is to leave out a resistor and you may end up in problems because not doing what AE suggested.

Another choise is to add a resistor because it was the suggestion, even if it might be possible to leave the resistor out.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ It is quite possible (likely it is actually a parasitic diode to substrate so it scales with the size of devices inside the IC - the the switching MOSFET will be large ) that the Zener diode on Vin is much bigger than that on EN. So if there is an overvoltage transient, the Vin pin Zener will survive more joules of energy than EN. Adding the resistor ensures that you cannot get into the region where the energy absorbed by the EN Zener is high enough to destroy it while the Vin Zener survives. \$\endgroup\$
    – Mike James
    Commented 18 hours ago

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.