The ADM7155 datasheet has this table on page 5:

The line "EN to GND" states that the EN pin will tolerate up to +7V with respect to ground. This makes sense, because that's also the maximum tolerable potential at VIN.
The EN pin doesn't need any more protection than VIN itself. If you tie EN directly to VIN, and you are sure that VIN is never going to exceed +7V, then no damage will occur. Whatever is "protecting" EN inside the IC, if anything, is sufficient already.
I have no idea what the "AE team" is talking about, the datasheet makes it abundantly clear that tying EN to VIN is perfectly fine.
The only hint I could find regarding protection is from this diagram on page 14:

All this does is reinforce my conviction that no damage will occur unless you apply more than +7V to EN, which would cause the zener diode to conduct heavily. However, that zener diode does imply that including a resistor would limit EN current in the event that you apply more than +7V. If you've tied EN directly to VIN, and then set VIN above +7V, then the entire IC is already damaged, and any damage to EN circuitry is moot.
I would suggest that this "resistor protection" might only be relevant if you are controlling the ADM7155 from a separate system, able to apply above +7V to EN. In that case a resistor would permit the internal protection zener diode to "clamp" to the +7V maximum, while the resistor limits the resulting current.
That's still not a great idea, it's best to ensure that the control system never apply more than necessary to "trigger" EN, which is determined by the hysteresis and thresholds described on page 24. I infer from that rather detailed description that it is intended for EN to permit under-voltage lockout, using a resistor divider to apply some fraction of \$V_{IN}\$ to EN; perhaps that's the motivation for a discussion about using resistors with EN.